

That was stunningly good. There are those who will insist I'm 'grading on a curve', comparing it to the preceding books in the series, rather than mysteries or novels in general, to come up with such a glowing statement, but I honestly think this was just a well written book, designed to effectively entertain and engross the reader.
The first book in the series I liked, the second book I didn't, this third book: I loved. 1/?
He's consistent in providing a mystery (that I only got just before it was revealed, which is my perfect ideal in mystery books, and to me demonstrates skill on behalf of the writer, leading the reader) that will be methodically investigated; 7h
1) The pacing
2) The female characters
7h
2) I would be totally unsurprised if after the second Reacher book, Child got a buttload of negative feedback about how his female character(s?) were written. If so, he definitely took it to heart and did better here. 7h
I get that readers will react differently to the age gap and background between Reacher and Jodie, but I think Child's framing is about as 7h
On an unrelated note, and one I find harder to articulate, I admire how Child handled the discussion around the Vietnam War. Don't get me wrong, these books could easily win a 'pro-military/military propaganda' label. Given some characters consulted in pursuit of the mystery are serving military, the resentful manner in which they talk about the Vietnamese is not a shock, and also not 7h
I think if there's one area that really shouts 'I was written in the late 90s!' it's the ableism prominent in a main villain having extensive burn scarring, an amputation and a prosthesis, a hook, of course, and how often those features are focused on to increase the sense of menace he exudes. There's no objective reason to fear someone who has traumatic injuries, who is 7h
I'll definitely be picking up the next book, cross your fingers the writing quality endures, even improves! 7h