data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14f98/14f988453c0e70fec0e0935464c5f1bd6dc7e6c1" alt="post image"
Greetings from Aruba! ☺️🌴🌊
One thought: people are so pissed at the advice for women in Zika-affected areas not to get pregnant. Why? There is a legitimate risk: the long term effects of Zika infection during pregnancy cannot be known, but may include increased risk of mental illness. The short term ones include miscarriage, lifelong disability for the child and death after birth without intensive care. And there is no vaccine yet, no cure, no prevention strategy.
Useful overview of how Zika emerged and what it means.
What I found most interesting in this book was the least scientific: how the author, a NYT science reporter, actually chased and reported the story of Zika. Its most problematic chapter, on the advice to delay pregnancy, is actually better read as an argument instead of scientific reportage.
This is creating a bit of cognitive dissonance: the author keeps making alarming statements about Zika in Puerto Rico, but I live in PR and there is no panic on the ground here. We are used to mosquito-borne illnesses in the tropics and take a pragmatic stance...
From an information and reportage standpoint this is pretty OK. There some information gaps that need to be addressed, though, and this isn't very elegant writing. However, the end of the book needs work, particularly the chapter "Delaying Pregnancy" which makes me want to set it on fire.
Yeah, no, it's not for pregnant women that we're rushing vaccine production it's for the fetuses/babies. He makes a "not all men" statement in the prior chapter which almost made me rip out the pages.
Um, I think we need a basic primer on study type. He's changed the study-type in half a page - you can nest a case-control within a larger cohort study but case-control and cohort designs are not interchangeable. (This makes me want to poke my eyeballs out)
I've seen this map before - in the actual sitrep on 5/26/16, the date it was released. It's actually quite easy to read in color (the timeline and corresponding countries are shades of blue), not so black and white. The graphic should have been recolored to make it understandable in black and white.