Home Feed
Home
Search
Search
Add Review, Blurb, Quote
Add
Activity
Activity
Profile
Profile
Books of the Century
Books of the Century: A Hundred Years of Authors, Ideas and Literature | Charles McGrath
10 posts | 2 read | 4 to read
Presents book reviews and essays on literature originally published in The New York times book review.
Amazon Indiebound Barnes and Noble WorldCat Goodreads LibraryThing
Pick icon
100%
blurb
Megabooks
post image

Joining in! Not bad considering I didn‘t read much until 2012 and have a severe recency bias.

Really surprised there were none by Maggie O‘Farrell or Lauren Groff or many other authors. Too many by Saunders and Ward. They‘re both fantastic authors, but I feel like they should‘ve chosen no more than one from each author for a wider variety. 🤷🏻‍♀️🤔

peaKnit I agree, was surprise by multiples of Ward. 4mo
LiteraryinPA I agree that a cap of one per author would have been better. 4mo
mdemanatee Was really surprised not to see Groff 4mo
See All 8 Comments
BarbaraBB You didn‘t read much until 2012? I didn‘t know that! 4mo
BarbaraBB I agree with one book per author. Or one series like the Ferrante one, instead of multiple entries. 4mo
vivastory Chiming in that there should have been a limit of one per author to allow more space for others (edited) 4mo
Megabooks @BarbaraBB I did read some in my pre-vet school years, but with working 2 jobs, going to school, and having 1-2 volunteering things, I didn‘t have time for more than a book a week if that. It was about the same in vet school. I mostly read nonfiction, which still fits what I read more of in stressful years (like this one)! 🙃 4mo
BarbaraBB A book a week is still a lot. But I get what you say. I read less too during uni but for me that was in another century 🤣 4mo
81 likes8 comments
blurb
Amiable
post image

I didn‘t keep track of the exact number, but I also have at least 10 more books from the NYT list sitting in my TBR shelves. Now I want to find and read them so I can re-do this checklist. 😄

Allbymyshelf Wow 30! 🙌 How did you make this graphic, it‘s super cool! 4mo
BarbaraBB @readmyeyes There‘s a free link today to the list and the graphic on https://modernmrsdarcy.com 4mo
Allbymyshelf ⬆️ I figured out the graphic is on the NYT site lol 🤪 4mo
See All 9 Comments
Allbymyshelf Thank you!! 😊 @BarbaraBB 4mo
Laughterhp I‘ve read 8 😬😬😬 4mo
Amiable @readmyeyes Yes! Thankfully the NYT did the graphic for me because there is no way I could do anything like that myself. 😄 4mo
kspenmoll Yay for you!🙌🏻 4mo
Amiable @kspenmoll It seems like an odd list. But every “best of” list is so subjective, anyway. 🤷🏻‍♀️ 4mo
5feet.of.fury …2. Lol Station Eleven & Fifth Season 4mo
50 likes9 comments
blurb
BarbaraBB
post image

Thanks to the #Bookerprize, the #ToB and the #1001books list I‘ve read a lot of them yet I do think it‘s too America focused. I do love American fiction, but I‘d expected a more international list.

Amiable Good point! 4mo
TrishB Agreed! But well done. 4mo
Ruthiella Yup! So many I‘ve read because they were in a list or part of a challenge. 4mo
See All 8 Comments
staci.reads Impressive! 4mo
vlwelser I think you're probably the winner. 4mo
vivastory 53! Very impressive 4mo
Megabooks Wow! You definitely have me beat! 4mo
Suet624 Fantastic. 4mo
73 likes8 comments
quote
Lcsmcat
post image

@laur89 I thought this might interest you. It‘s in the tagged book but you can also find it here: https://www.nytimes.com/1996/10/06/books/too-big-to-write-smaller.html. I think he got away with the length because of who he was and it SHOULD have been edited down! (Article contains spoilers that this snippet doesn‘t.) @Hestapleton @twohectobooks

twohectobooks Yep, I agree. Sister Carrie was written earlier, is way shorter, and is way better (although I reserve judgment till the end). 5y
JCPaulk I wanted to like it, but an English lit professor ruined it 20 years ago by telling us the ending. 5y
Susannah This is so interesting. I think the tendency of established, popular writers to write more and more pages as their careers progress is (still) a real problem today. Look at Diana Gabaldon: I know people joyfully gobble up every page she writes, but I read Outlander, and even that first of the series was massively overwritten. “Where was the editor?” is a regular refrain for me. 5y
See All 6 Comments
Lcsmcat @Susannah Yes! Dare I say in public that I think Harry Potter, Book 4 needed a firm editor? Rowling had reached international fame at that point and I felt like it could have been trimmed but she didn‘t have to make concessions in order to get published, so she didn‘t. 5y
Susannah Exactly. And people want more, don‘t they, even if it has a negative impact on the story that‘s being told. It feels like a lack of editorial oversight to me. 5y
laur89 So interesting. On the other end, you have authors like Gaiman, who release a well-edited book like American Gods, and then come out with an anniversary edition with a lot of the text that was edited out. 5y
33 likes6 comments
blurb
Lcsmcat
post image

I get a lot of my books from library book sales. Also secondhand stores, ThriftBooks, BetterWorldBooks, local indies, and, on occasion, Amazon. #booksource #30JuneBooks @howjessreads

Crazeedi I want to go!!!😉💞 5y
Amiable I was at a library book sale this afternoon! Love them. 5y
Lcsmcat @Amiable How fun! @Crazeedi This one was a month or so ago, but I‘m still working on the book haul from it. 5y
58 likes3 comments
quote
Lcsmcat
post image

I love perusing the “Oops!” sidebars almost as much as the reviews. And I had to share this one with the #catherbuddyread. 😆

Lindy Is Charles McGrath calling feminist novels inartistic? 6y
Lcsmcat Not Charles McGrath. Whoever was writing reviews in the New York Times in 1913. 6y
Graywacke Wow 6y
See All 6 Comments
Crazeedi This is interesting!! 6y
Lcsmcat @Graywacke @Crazeedi There‘s also an interview with her from 1924, after My Antonía was published. You can also find it online here: https://www.nytimes.com/1924/12/21/archives/-restlessness-such-as-ours-does-not-... (edited) 6y
CarolynM Oh, I don't know, I think she might have🤔😂 6y
55 likes3 stack adds6 comments
blurb
Lcsmcat
post image

My #bookhaul, sitting on the table we found to go next to my reading chair. All this for $3, and it supported a library.
Which ones have you read?

BeansPage 😲😍😲 6y
Melissa_J Wow!! 6y
Djspens Nice pile!! 6y
See All 9 Comments
Amiable Awesome haul! 6y
Mdargusch 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 6y
DivineDiana Amazing haul! 👏🏻❤️📚👏🏻❤️ 6y
TaciturnWhenReading That. Is. Amazing! 6y
Graciouswarriorprincess That‘s amazing! 6y
baes Wow! 😊 6y
79 likes9 comments
blurb
zsuzsanna_reads
post image

Three historical Oops!es from the NYTimes book review.

Laura317 These are hilarious! “Cut out the jerks...they depress me.” 😂😂😂 6y
MicheleinPhilly Asylum waif??? 😂😂😂😂 6y
sprainedbrain You have to wonder who they had writing these. 😂😂😂 6y
See All 8 Comments
Caroline2 Oh I must admit I agree with the catch-22 review! I didn‘t not get on with that book at all!! 😳 6y
Aimeesue I agree with the Anne of Green Gables review - there's no change in her from beginning to end-but i disagree with their stance. That's the point of AoGG! Anne is Anne is Anne, wherever she goes. People don't change Anne; she changes THEM. I 6y
tpixie Amazing! 6y
zsuzsanna_reads @Caroline2 I used to love it in my teens and twenties but had to bail on a reread recently! 6y
zsuzsanna_reads @Laura317 @tpixie @sprainedbrain I'll try and post some more of these. 😊 6y
41 likes8 comments
review
zsuzsanna_reads
post image
Pickpick

I picked up this gem of a book from.the Oxfam shop over the summer. It was published on the centenary of the NYTimes Book Review and has 626 pages of book reviews, essays and author interviews published between 1896 & 1997. Not to mention what they call Oops!-es, when the reviewer just got it wrong. If you come across this, it's really worth getting.