so-soNot a fan. In the guise of “reporting,” the author went into this project with what seemed like a predetermined conclusion (the USA treats its territories terribly) and then pointed out every little thing to support his opinion. He may not be wrong but he turned me off when he belittled the #USVirginIsland‘s museum & then did the same for other territory museums. A reporter, in my humble opinion, should try to remain neutral and see where the ⬇️
Texreader facts lead. I felt he didn‘t even try to do so. The narrator didn‘t help—his voice was condescending much of the time. I learned a lot, but the way he disseminated the facts grated on me. I‘d love to learn more about the territories, but not from this author. At least he piqued my interest in them. Also works for #PuertoRico #USVI #readingtheAmericas (edited) 2y
Librarybelle Yikes! I may have to avoid this one 2y
Texreader @Librarybelle I don‘t think his conclusion was wrong. I just didn‘t like how he reached it. Belittling museums, even small ones, though, gets me where it hurts. They are trying and proud of what they‘ve accomplished so far. That incident just turned the tide of my opinion. For example he was appalled the USVI museum didn‘t have anything about pirates! 2y
See All 6 Comments
Librarybelle Oh my! Yes, I agree about museums. 2y
TieDyeDude I didn't listen to the audio, and I read this a while ago, but it sounds like the tone of the narrator might have exasperated any shortcomings in the writing? I also remember going into it expecting to read about how America neglects its territories more than an unbiased exploration. It made me want to visit these places, though! 2y
Texreader @TieDyeDude I kept wondering as I was reading it exactly your point: was it the narration that was the crux of the problem and whether reading it would have gone better? I think the narration was definitely a big factor affecting my reaction. I also think you went into the book with eyes wide open. I really appreciate your thoughts on this one. 2y
54 likes6 comments