data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b60/d3b60e24570300e3ec64f8dcf44cfe8f3723d1a1" alt="review review"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a502/2a5025de61a420e3ae7cfc5d039e0c11a7f51cb3" alt="post image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f00f8/f00f830a20fb2da9005ab54a26a4b7e583cb94eb" alt="Pan"
Disappointing. I felt the main problem is that there wasn't enough material on Leonardo & his Vitruvian Man to justify an entire book. If Lester was a more engaging writer, then maybe the book would work better. But as written, the book lacked cohesion. I felt it was a confusing stream of disjointed parts with no coherent focus and too much conjecture and supposition.
This is my January #bookspin