![Pick](https://image.librarything.com/pics/litsy_webpics/icon_pick.png)
Ehrman attracts a lot of criticism but his books merely present the scholarly consensus. For the record, Jesus is about as well attested as a Jew of that time could be. The author runs through all the arguments in solid and coherent manner.
Riveted_Reader_Melissa Have you read Zealot, I found that to be a very good book about the man that was Jesus before the myth wrapped around him?
ZEALOT: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth 9y
![[tagged book]](https://image.librarything.com/pics/litsy_webpics/icon_taggedBook@3x.png)
hof1991 The difference is Ehrman has an academic background in this area and is reflecting the scholarly consensus. Not true of Zealot despite its bestselling status. 9y
2 likes2 comments