pickI wobbled a bit in Chapter 2 on Scientific Inference, but otherwise this was a very clear and readable introduction to the subject. One of the best so far in this series.
pickI knew nothing about Schopenhauer going in, and if asked I would probably have guessed that he was a composer. I didn't really understand the explanation about Schopenhauer's theory of the Will as the meaning seemed to slip and slide about and just as I thought I was beginning to understand it the concept changed. I don't know who was at fault, me, the author, or Schopenhauer.
There‘s not enough time
To learn all I want to know
And yet still I‘ll try
#haikuaday
#haikuhive
@dabbe
@TheBookHippie
@TheSpineView
@JenlovesJT47
@lil1inblue
@debinhawaii
@bellabella
@julieclair
@anncrystal
@booksandcoffee4me
@reggie
@eggs
@vivastory
@mimi28
@jdiehr
@CBee
pickThe author admits in the first chapter that fascism is difficult to define and that different characteristics will be emphasised depending on what definition one chooses. The characteristics he chooses to highlight have some uncomfortable resonances this year (2025) considering this book dates from 2014. ⬇
“It‘s most direct successor in modern French literature may be Baudelaire‘s post-romantic” Fleurs du mal”. It was only a few years after “The Regrets” that the wars of religion between varying factions of Protestants and Catholics (1562-98) profoundly changed French culture and set the stage for the more highly structured and often less personal literature of the 17th century”.
pickBuilding + Culture = Architecture.
The author takes some buildings he sees as iconic (emphasising this is a personal choice which would be different for somebody from a different cultural background) and how the cultural meanings they accumulate make them architecturally significant. An interesting book which could be improved with better pictures as the photos don't really illustrate the points the author is making.
