

Some unique things but was hard to understand can't fully comprehend yet
2 likes
Definitely an interesting experiment, but it often lapses into that metaphor/logic loop It mostly seems to ask the reader to consider a probability method of thought, instead of pattern recognition, which is important for sure, but it's pitched by a guy who comes off as an armchair philosopher - which might be the point - but even the wording of the introduction kind of adds to that tone.